Reflection

What is Reflection?

“Reflection is an active, persistent and careful consideration of any belief or assumption, their origins, and their unintended effect[i]

In other words, reflection in your course is an exercise where students can critically examine a concrete experience. Through this examination, the students confront and challenge their assumptions, beliefs, and thought patterns and connect their experiences to the theories covered in the course.

Scholars define reflection in various ways, but all definitions have the following common elements: [ii]

  • students are actively engaged,
  • the reflections are generated through a concrete experience,
  • students explore their beliefs and assumptions,
  • and the reflection activity contributes to new knowledge.

How it works

Through reflective activities, students are encouraged to analyze their actions and the material they are learning. One model to conceptualize this is the “What? So What? Now What?” framework. As students go through an experience, they are first encouraged to define that experience (“What?”). They are then challenged to illustrate the significance of the activity with respect to course material, personal experiences, or professional practice (“So What?”). Finally, based on the significance of the activity, they must plan next steps (“Now What?”). These three questions form a cycle that can facilitate ongoing reflection.

Benefits of Reflection

  • facilitates the connection between theory and practical experience[iii]
  • contributes to perception and behaviour transformation[iv]
  • promotes conscious action and self-awareness [v]
  • fosters problem solving, professional development, and lifelong learning[vi]
  • contributes to deeper understanding of issues[vii]

Activities

The activities listed here are designed to be done during your class time, and have been organized from shortest and simplest to longest and most complex. While these activities can be done in isolation, they are most effective when combined with a follow-up assignment. Many of these are based on ideas from Stuart Watson of the Northwest Service Academy[viii]

In-Class: 1 to 5 Minute Activities:

These are activities that can be used to prime students for critical reflection.

Discussion Question: Individuals in the lecture respond to a question posed by the course director. Questions can be answered individually, in groups or online.

Words: Individually or in groups, the students share one to three words that represent their experience.

In-Class: 5 to 30 Minute Activities:

Current Literature: Have student read a current piece of literature (scholarly article, newspaper, blog) and relate it to their experience.

Letter: Students compose a letter to themselves containing their assumptions, beliefs, and values before the experience. They submit it to the course director, who hands it back to them after the experience. Students comment on any changes they observe.

Wall Writings: A large piece of paper(s) are placed on the walls of the classroom and students write about their experience. They then circulate to view and comment on what others have written.

In-Class: 30 Minute to Two-hour Activities:

Timeline: Students create a timeline documenting their concrete experience with all significant events and explanations. Students compare their timeline with others in their group to form a group timeline.

Life Experiences: After being presented with a dilemma, students are asked to use their personal experiences to take a stance on the issue. Students must explicitly relate past experiences with their stance.

Artistic Creation: Students create a skit, poem, collage or other artistic representation of their experience.

Interviews: Students work in groups to interview each other about their experiences using questions provided by the course director. Students record their summarized responses.

Assignments

Explained here are several types of assignments that are commonly used to facilitate reflection. With the exception of the first, these are completed outside of class time.

In-Class Discussions/Debates

Suitable for smaller courses, in-class discussions can be an excellent tool for facilitating critical reflection around a topic or issue. While not an assignment in itself, it serves as the foundation for the other assignments listed here. The focus of the conversation might be an experience the students shared, an ethical dilemma presented to them, or even an abstract concept they have been given. Following the discussion, you can assign them any number of follow-up activities to help your students think more deeply about their experience.

As a facilitator, your role is to keep the discussion moving and provide ideas to spark conversation. As an instructor, you can evaluate students’ participation based on the amount and/or quality of their contributions.

Journals

Journal writing is the most widely used reflection method in higher education, and it can be used throughout the learning experience, rather than prior to or post experience.[ix] It can be used as a mechanism to ameliorate learning experience by linking theory and concrete experience[x].

Journal writing can be[xi]:

  • Either structured paper journal or unstructured blogging online
  • Either minimal reflection/analysis with vital literature evidence or limited evidence with high reflective aspect
  • utilized prior, during or post the learner’s experience
  • used to aid learners to scrutinize their principles, values, presumptions and experiences
  • used as an opportunity to allow students to connect their experiences with their academic experiences as well as future employment, rather than simply stating facts

On-line Discussion Forum Contributions

It is a common practice to ask students to make a minimum weekly contribution to an online discussion forum on class topics or concrete experiences. This allows you to gauge participation and understanding, but it also carries numerous benefits for the students, including:

  • Students share insights with their peers
  • Increases student involvement in course
  • Facilitates group problem solving
  • Can be used for self and group evaluation

It allows the students to easily provide feedback to the course director and/or community partner (if applicable)


[i] Dewey, cited in Dyment, J. E., & O'Connell, T. S. (2011). Assessing the quality of reflection in student journals: A review of the research. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 81-97. (Citation on p.81)

[ii] Rogers, R.R. 2001. Reflection in Higher Education: A Concept Analysis. Innovative Higher Education, 26(1), 37-57.

[iii] Koliba, C. 2004. Assessing Reflection Assignments for Public Affairs Courses: Implications for Educating Reflective Practitioners. Journal of Public Affairs Education. 10(4), 295-309.

[iv] Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K. & Wong, F.K. (2008). A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work. Assessment & Evaluation in higher education, 33 (4), 369-379.
Rogers, R.R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative higher education, 26 (1), 37-58.
Wong, F.K., Kember, D., Chung, L.Y. & Yan, L. (1995). Assessing the level of student reflection from reflective journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 22 (1), 48-57.

[v] Rogers, R.R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative higher education, 26 (1), 37-58.
Ash, S.L. & Clayton, P.H. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 29 (2), 137-155.

[vi] Plack, M.P., Driscoll, M., Marquez, M., Cuppernull, L., Maring, J. & Greenberg, L. (2007). Assessing reflective writing on a pediatric clerkship by using a modified bloom’s taxonomy. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 7 (4), 285-291.

[vii] Ash, S.L. & Clayton, P.H. (2004). The articulated learning: An approach to guided reflection and assessment. Innovative Higher Education, 29 (2), 137-155.

[viii] Watson, Stewart. 2001. Reflection Toolkit., Northwest Service Academy, Metro Center, Portland, OR. Available at: http://www1.aucegypt.edu/maan/pdf/Reflection%20Toolkit%201.pdf

[ix] Dyment, J.E. & O'Connell, T.S. (2011). Assessing the quality of reflection in student journals: a review of the research. Teaching in higher education, 16 (1), 81-97.
Plack, M.P., Driscoll, M., Marquez, M., Cuppernull, L., Maring, J. & Greenberg, L. (2007). Assessing reflective writing on a pediatric clerkship by using a modified bloom’s taxonomy. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 7 (4), 285-291.
Wallman, A., Lindblad, A.K., Hall, S., Lundmark, A. & Ring, L. (2007). A categorization scheme for assessing pharmacy students’ levels of reflection during internships. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72 (1), 5-15.

[x] Bringle, R.G., & Hatcher, J.A. (1996). Implementing service learning in higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 67, 221-239.
Dyment, J.E. & O'Connell, T.S. (2011). Assessing the quality of reflection in student journals: a review of the research. Teaching in higher education, 16 (1), 81-97.
Kember, D., McKay, J., Sinclair, K. & Wong, F.K. (2008). A four-category scheme for coding and assessing the level of reflection in written work. Assessment & Evaluation in higher education, 33 (4), 369-379.
Koliba, C.J. (2004). Assessing reflection assignments for public affairs courses: Implications for educating reflective practitioners. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10 (4), 295-309.
Plack, M.P., Driscoll, M., Marquez, M., Cuppernull, L., Maring, J. & Greenberg, L. (2007). Assessing reflective writing on a pediatric clerkship by using a modified bloom’s taxonomy. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 7 (4), 285-291.
Wallman, A., Lindblad, A.K., Hall, S., Lundmark, A. & Ring, L. (2007). A categorization scheme for assessing pharmacy students’ levels of reflection during internships. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72 (1), 5-15.

[xi] Dyment, J.E. & O'Connell, T.S. (2011). Assessing the quality of reflection in student journals: a review of the research. Teaching in higher education, 16 (1), 81-97.